Quote:
Where does a medical trade union get the authority to perform a medically unnecessary, non therapeutic amputation of a normal, healthy, functional body part from unconsenting male infants?
I answered this one, you just ignored it.
Where does a medical trade union get the authority to authorize parents to choose to perform a medically unnecessary, non therapeutic amputation of a normal, healthy, functional body part from unconsenting male infants?
they have no choise but to autherize parents because if they didn't it would be a violation of parental rights.
Where does a medical trade union get the right to violate it's own basic ethical code to do what is in the best interests of it's patients?
Because it's not unethical.
Where does a medical trade union get the right to violate it's own basic ethical code to do what is not in the best interests of it's patients simply because the parents want it to be done??
same answer as above two
Where does ANY doctor get the right and authority to perform a medically unnecessary, non therapeutic amputation of a normal, healthy, functional body part from unconsenting male infants who are their patients?
they have the right because the parents give it to them.
In the end parental rights are unbreakable and there is nothing unethical about circumcision.[/b]
|
Is this what is called talking around in circles? Seems like it to me, but i really would have preferred actual answers..gat any?