Topic: Full Term?
View Single Post
  #1  
May 7th, 2010, 01:23 PM
jhmomofmany's Avatar
jhmomofmany jhmomofmany is offline
Look! A Dancing Banana!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Upper Michigan
Posts: 14,600
Send a message via Yahoo to jhmomofmany
When did they change the def. of full term? I was *always* told 38 completed weeks is "full term" and that delivering anytime within two weeks of your due date is "on time". Now 36 weeks (some girls in the DDCs are being told 34 weeks!) is full term, and 39 weeks is past due?? Really, what's the deal?

I suspect it has something to do with the rising incidence of premature birth which has (thankfully!) led to better medical care of preemies. Everybody knows somebody who had their baby in the 7th-8th month and "that baby turned out fine". Hey, why be pregnant 9 months when you can get the job done in less time? Could this be another symptom of the "assembly line" style of hospital/OB care? "Get 'er in, get 'er out, here's my bill, who's next"

Makes me wonder...
__________________
~Jennifer, wife of one, mother of many

Robert: 20 Raechel: 18 Daniel: 15 Joseph: 13 Thomas: 10 Mary Mae: 7 Lucy Marie: 5 John Anthony: 2 AND Baby due Dec. 2015

Always Missing our Angels: Hope (7-8-06 @36w); Francis (7-4-12 @12w); Charlie (1-19-15 @ 6w)


Congratulations Raechel and Kaleb, married May, 2015

Reply With Quote