View Single Post
  #1  
April 16th, 2012, 05:59 AM
fluffycheeks's Avatar
fluffycheeks fluffycheeks is offline
Mega Super Mommy
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,207
What do you think of this article, published a couple of months ago by Psychology Today? It claims that letting a baby cry is actually very harmful to their brain development, as well as detrimental to their independence and relationships later in life.

Excerpts:


Quote:
With neuroscience, we can confirm what our ancestors took for granted---that letting babies get distressed is a practice that can damage children and their relational capacities in many ways for the long term. We know now that leaving babies to cry is a good way to make a less intelligent, less healthy but more anxious, uncooperative and alienated person who can pass the same or worse traits on to the next generation.


Quote:
One strangely popular notion still around today is to let babies 'cry it out' when they are left alone, isolated in cribs or other devices. This comes from a misunderstanding of child and brain development.

Babies grow from being held. Their bodies get dysregulated when they are physically separated from caregivers. (See here for more.)

Babies indicate a need through gesture and eventually, if necessary, through crying. Just as adults reach for liquid when thirsty, children search for what they need in the moment. Just as adults become calm once the need is met, so do babies.

There are many longterm effects of undercare or need-neglect in babies (e.g., Bremmer et al, 1998; Blunt Bugental et al., 2003; Dawson et al., 2000; Heim et al 2003).

Secure attachment is related to responsive parenting, such as when babies wake up and cry at night.


Full Article:
Dangers of
Reply With Quote