We pride ourselves on having the friendliest
and most welcoming forums for moms and moms to be! Please take a moment
for free so you can be a part of our growing community of mothers.
If you have any problems registering please drop an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Our community is moderated by our moderation team so you won't see spam or offensive messages posted on our forums. Each of our message boards is hosted by JustMommies hosts, whose names are listed at the top each board. We hope you find our message boards friendly, helpful, and fun to be on!
I've read a lot of scary reviews. And it's got just as bad of side effects as pitocin and cervadil but it seems that Cytotec has a worse rap because it can't be removed. I dont need to know the risks and all I'm looking for experiences.
What was your experience with Cytotec?
How long did it take from the time you had it until birth?
Well I can tell you, that while I have no had any experiences with it I certainly would not use it. The label itself says its not suppose to be used with pregnant women, For the reason alone I would not use it. It is used as a cheaper alternative
Melissa, Wife to Kenneth and Mommy to Courtney, Mikayla and Caelyn, and our BOY Kenny!
Cytotec has an interesting history. It was originally made as a drug to protect against ulcers while taking NSAIDs like Ibuprofen. It was noted that if used in pregnant women it would induce labor. This is why the FDA in the US had Searle put the big scary warning "not for pregnant women". And you certainly should not use this in pregnancy to prevent ulcers.
Researches began studying its labor inducing properties and found that it is the most effective medication available for induction of labor. This happened after the drug went off patent so there was no financial incentive for Searle to ask the FDA to change the indications and warnings.
Early on the best dose was not known and most people were using 50 mcg in the vagina. At this dose it sometimes caused too many contractions and hyperstimulation. Now people use 25 mcg and hyperstimulation is uncommon. There were also some problems early on with uterine ruptures in women with previous c-section.
Cervadil is the competing drug and it is still on patent. That means it is very expensive and drug companies are still making lots of money off of it. Cytotec costs less then 1% of cervadil, no one is making money off of it and therefore there is no voice to defend its use.
To make matters worse, when Ru486, the abortion pill was introduced in the US cytotec was part of the protocol to induce first trimester abortions. Searle was afraid of the bad publicity and went very public warning everyone not to use cytotec in pregnant women as it is contraindicated. This included Letters to every physician in the US.
It definitely works better for induction then any other agent. When dosed properly the risk of hyperstimulation is very small. It should not be used in VBAC induction and maybe not in IUGR. In most other cases it is probably the best choice.
It is unfortunate how politics and money effect the public perception of medications. Cytotec is safe and effective for induction and in many cases the first choice.
I am sure ANY drug out there on the market has horrible reviews and has terrible side affects.
I was supposed to get two rounds of cytotec, but they stopped after one since it put me into early labor. After 8 hours, my water started leaking. I started pitocin and two hours later my water broke. After 13 hours, my son was born.
No complications from Cytotec or Pitocin, no reactions, nothing crazy. It worked perfectly, like it was supposed to.