Quote:
Quote:
|
Well I disagree. Spanking a child on the butt is not the same as slapping or hitting. When you spank it doesn't hurt the child.[/b]
|
How does it not hurt? (I'm honestly asking - not being catty.) I would assume the sting of a hand on the bottom would cause a level of pain - certainly not extreme - but a sting. Otherwise, why is it done? What is the reinforcement if there isn't a sting with the spank?
[/b]
|
Well, I was spanked, and my mom said it mostly embarassed me. I guess spanked is not the right word, lightly tapped. I cried, but it was because I was sad I was getting in trouble, not because it hurt. I wasn't spanked to cause pain, but rather to cause embarassment (I hate to use this word, but I can't think of a better one).
Okay...so I'll change what I call it. I will "lightly tap" my child if I feel it works, certainly not enough to sting or cause pain. I guess I was just using the wrong word for it.
I certainly don't mean to offend anyone, I think different forms of discipline work for different children, and that will be the biggest factor in my decision with my children.
In respect to this study, I totally believe that being abused as a child has lasting, negative effects that some people can never work themselves out of. My husband was abused as I said earlier, and I think that will make him a lot more sensitive to our children instead of more violent (which I have seen some victims of abuse do).