Log In Sign Up

Qotd 2/19


Forum: 2009 Playroom

Notices

Welcome to the JustMommies Message Boards.

We pride ourselves on having the friendliest and most welcoming forums for moms and moms to be! Please take a moment and register for free so you can be a part of our growing community of mothers. If you have any problems registering please drop an email to boards@justmommies.com.

Our community is moderated by our moderation team so you won't see spam or offensive messages posted on our forums. Each of our message boards is hosted by JustMommies hosts, whose names are listed at the top each board. We hope you find our message boards friendly, helpful, and fun to be on!

Reply Post New Topic
  Subscribe To 2009 Playroom LinkBack Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
  #1  
February 19th, 2011, 11:25 AM
mommy2Breana+Brandon's Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 39,401
What age do you think is a good age to stop having children?


(NO debate please)
__________________

Do you love food, entertaining, cooking?!?! Then you will LOVE Tastefully Simple. www.tastefullysimple.com/web/cpisch

Reply With Quote
  #2  
February 19th, 2011, 12:03 PM
catherineclare's Avatar Mega Super Mommy
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,290
For me personally, 35. I noticed a HUGE difference in my pregnancies. Had my first baby at 20 and my second just shy of 30. My first was a lot easier. Second I had less energy etc etc. Hubby and I have already decided that if we have another it has to be before I'm 35.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
February 19th, 2011, 01:07 PM
wildflower_142's Avatar Mega Super Mommy
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,137
Send a message via AIM to wildflower_142 Send a message via Yahoo to wildflower_142
hmm well when i first started having kids I said i didn't want to have any kids past the age of 30. My mom had my brother at 32, and someone mistook her for his grandma. She was horrified, and I never wanted that to happen with me. But I had Catie at 32 and even though Ken and I are done if i had another baby now I wouldn't be to upset about it. I don't think i'd want to have any kids past 39 though.
__________________
Chris mom to 4 girls: Ashleigh, Madisyn, Emely, & Cathryn


Reply With Quote
  #4  
February 19th, 2011, 02:59 PM
monica8's Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,376
Right now I'd say 30.
__________________





Reply With Quote
  #5  
February 19th, 2011, 03:17 PM
*Jennifer*'s Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 5,500
Are we talking personally or in general? Personally, I think past 40 for me because I just wouldn't have the energy. Then again, 2 of DH's cousins had babies past 40 and are doing just fine.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
February 19th, 2011, 06:55 PM
~KMV~'s Avatar Mega Super Mommy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,417
I always said I never wanted kids.... then when I got pregnant DH and I talked about how many kids we wanted all together and agreed on 2. I wanted to have or be pregnant with both by time I turned 28, well that happens this August, not so sure I'm gonna me the cut off...
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #7  
February 19th, 2011, 07:14 PM
~Paula~'s Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 27,123
For me, the cut off was 30. I had Kayla at 19 and I was so energetic and popped right back into my pre-preg jeans, my pregnancy was easy, etc...

I had Emily at 27 and it was a lot different. I was so much more tired, the pregnancy was rough and my body took it rougher.

I had Abby 3 months after turning 30 and the pregnancy was so rough, I had 0 energy, it took it's toll on my body.

If we decided to have another, we'd have HAD to have done it before I turned 35, preferably before I turned 33.

It just depends on the person, their energy, etc.. I think someone having their first at 35 would be better than someone having their 3rd, because obviously you'd be worn out from the previous two. So again, it just depends.

I do think it's just gross to see these 50 and 60 and 70 year old women having kids!! Unacceptable in my opinion because it's pretty much guaranteed they will bury their Mom young and that's not fair to them.
__________________



Reply With Quote
  #8  
February 19th, 2011, 07:27 PM
mommy2Breana+Brandon's Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 39,401
Personally for me it was 30 and I had Xander 7 months after I turned 30.

But I also think each is their own.

But I do have to agree with Paula on the 60 and older.
__________________

Do you love food, entertaining, cooking?!?! Then you will LOVE Tastefully Simple. www.tastefullysimple.com/web/cpisch

Reply With Quote
  #9  
February 19th, 2011, 07:44 PM
MellieB's Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne, Aust.
Posts: 64,110
When nature says so. I think our bodies know when it will be too late for us.
__________________

Thanks to Claire1979 for the amazing siggy.


Tweet Tweet Facebook Bloggin'

Our Angel Baby on Facebook

Reply With Quote
  #10  
February 19th, 2011, 08:31 PM
Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sitka
Posts: 8,182
Send a message via Yahoo to natty
Well for me this is my last we agreed on 2 i will be 26 when this baby is born dh is getting snipped after this baby is born but in general around 40 depend g on the person.
__________________




Reply With Quote
  #11  
February 19th, 2011, 08:42 PM
Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 53,701
Send a message via AIM to MommaDucks Send a message via Yahoo to MommaDucks
I'm torn on this. For so long I believed I would *never* have kids past 30. My mom was 31 when she had me and was just plain NEVER fun to be with as a kid. Now, at 24 (don't hit me..) I don't feel done yet, but know I can't even think about it until close to 30...

Then I see some "older" women, on here and IRL around 40, that are just plain AMAZING mothers.

I guess I agree with the others, if the woman is physically and mentally able to raise, support, and enjoy their child, I don't care about her age.

But, I do agree with Paula, 60+ is just weird..... I'm already having to think about burying my mother, and (knock on wood) that shouldn't be for a while. To have to do it as a child/teen... That would just be devastating...
__________________

Nicole: Tom's Wife [5.7.05]; Mommy of Thomas [9.6.05], Collin [1.17.08], & Bailey [10.2.09]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
February 20th, 2011, 02:19 PM
3TeamH's Avatar Hayley
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,509
for me and my family 25 but only bc this is my 3rd child and i'm no michelle duggar. we would really like to adopt after this baby is born.

it's hard to judge for someone else's life, but I can't imagine being over 45 and having a baby.
__________________



Reply With Quote
  #13  
February 21st, 2011, 09:57 AM
Mega Super Mommy
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,853
Jumping in on this question after being away for a long time, and lurking some.

I say for me it's 35, I didn't even want to have children until I was 30 and I had my first at 30 and Elijah just after I turned 33. I'm done now. I just felt personally I would be a better mom if I waited until I was done with school and my career was established before starting a family.

BUT my mom had me 5 days before she turned 41. I grew up with older parents and didn't hate it, but sometimes envied my friends younger parents. Don't get me wrong my parents were and are great parents but it's not for me to have kids at that age.
__________________
My little munchkins
Reply With Quote
Reply

Topic Tools Search this Topic
Search this Topic:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0