Log In Sign Up

Why is spotting not counted as CD1?


Forum: Fertility Charting

Notices

Welcome to the JustMommies Message Boards.

We pride ourselves on having the friendliest and most welcoming forums for moms and moms to be! Please take a moment and register for free so you can be a part of our growing community of mothers. If you have any problems registering please drop an email to boards@justmommies.com.

Our community is moderated by our moderation team so you won't see spam or offensive messages posted on our forums. Each of our message boards is hosted by JustMommies hosts, whose names are listed at the top each board. We hope you find our message boards friendly, helpful, and fun to be on!

Reply Post New Topic
  LinkBack Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
  #1  
October 6th, 2009, 12:25 AM
Mega Super Mommy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,342
And is that the same for when docs ask you for 'the first day of your last bleed?'

I'm on CD35 and 17dpo and just had one spot of blood and pink when wiping yesterday but nothing since. I've been testing BFN so am eager for AF to hurry up so I can start TTC again. I was happy thinking it had started but now its not a flow or anything I can't count it as day 1 can I?
__________________
Jo xxx






Seperated June 2010 from my husband. One daughter DOB 26/07/2006. BFP 06/01/2011, due september but 'high risk' for premature birth.

Hi. Im Jolene. 31 years old. I suffered three years of a short luteal phase and didnt think I could get pregnant again without medical assistance but fell pregnant by accident and naturally. I am really happy and excited to be having a baby although knowing Im going it alone this time is a bit daunting and scary!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
October 6th, 2009, 05:12 AM
Mega Super Mommy
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,489
Yup, it is always the 1st day of full blown red flow..........not spotting.

I have a question for you - How did you find out that you needed Progesterone????
__________________
Proud Mommy to:
Alexis 11-03
Madelyn 5-06
Jackson born August 2010



Reply With Quote
  #3  
October 6th, 2009, 07:25 AM
pattyandthemoos's Avatar Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 58,138
Spotting before your AF can be premenstrual spotting or implantation spotting, or even ovulation spotting (if it happens midcycle). It is important to start cycle day one on the day you have a full blown flown. It doesn't have to be a red flow (as I most recently learned) but it does need to be a full flow and not spotting. If you need a panty liner then it is enough to consider it cycle day one.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
October 6th, 2009, 07:35 AM
Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,242
Even injuring yourself can cause some spotting. There are just too many possible causes and it doesn't mean that your body has started to flush things out yet. The first day that you have at least a light flow is CD 1, but spotting just doesn't count.
__________________
~Thanks Babydoll213 for my awesome siggie!~



Reply With Quote
  #5  
October 6th, 2009, 07:52 AM
ShawnaCAN's Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 10,160
Spotting can be related to other things, that's why. It's important to leave pre-menstrual spotting days with the last cycle to count the length of your LP accurately. The first day of flow, any color, is CD1.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
October 6th, 2009, 08:42 AM
Mega Super Mommy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,342
Ooh OK thanks everyone. Its as I thought - with other possibilities meaning it might not be AF - but once you KNOW its AF just wondered if you should then go back and count spotting as day 1? As counting my LP is very important a few days can make all the difference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shalyn View Post
Yup, it is always the 1st day of full blown red flow..........not spotting.

I have a question for you - How did you find out that you needed Progesterone????
Heya Shalyn. Well.....its a long story!

I had an early miscarriage (or sometimes known as a Chemical Pregnancy) and I started charting my cycles. I didn't realise at first but as fertility friend gives you snippets of info as you go I eventually realised that my luteal phase was short. I had a 5 day LP once and as long as 9 days but mostly 7 or 8 days long. I researched loads and found that you need at least 10 days to concieve but 12-14 is what you should have.
I was breastfeeding my daughter at the time and there is alot of conflicting evidence as to whether nursing can give you a short LP or not. I didn't think I could see the doc whilst nursing (they don't like you to ttc whilst nursing already and its all to easy for them to say its because of that). Instead I tried various other remedies like Agnus Castus and B6. The B6 gave me a 10 and a 11 day cycle in March but then it dropped back to 7 days. No idea why...I still take it. Anyhoo...I knew from online that progesterone was also the 'cure' for a luteal phase defect but I brought some Progesterone Cream to try. Its classed as a cosmetic not a medication...but nope, no difference there either. My last choice was to wean. I had hoped I could let my daughter wean when ready so I had held out as long as possible and she WAS very close to being ready. We were down to two nursings morn and night anyhoo so I just said that was it, it was all gone, and she must have been ready as she accepted it very well. That was in June. My cycles didn't change at all. I would have thought to get at least ONE day extra on my LP! And I have sat back and watched so many nursing mothers getting pregnant no prob I thought it MUST be ME not nursing! So last month I went to the docs for blood tests. As I was expecting my progesterone came back low. Well..on the computer it said '5 normal/low'. Anyhoo everything else was fine - including my prolactin, which would be high if my previous nursing was still in my system.
BUT surprisingly the doc wasn't supportive. She said the low prog mean't I didn't ovulate AT ALL. I have to disagree based on both my charting and getting + OPKS not to mention the fact I got pregs once even though I MC'd.
She told me I would be given clomid but to go away and cont ttc another 6mths first as the fertility clinic would like to see a longer gap between my stopping breastfeeding. I was devastated. I can't see ANOTHER 6mths doing anything for me except going back to the docs in exactly the same position I was already in. I told her about 'luteal phase defects' etc and she said I seem to believe what I've read online more than her. She said she had just come back from a fertility conference where they said giving progesterone wasn't recommended as 'it doesn't work'.
However she reluctantly agreed to let me try some (as, and I quote, 'you will only buy some online anyways') and she gave me two boxes.
As you can see it HAS worked. I've just had a 35 day cycle AND a LP of 16 days!!! I'm a little scared that if she is right about me not ovulating then I still don't have a chance but I would rather pass the 6mths with 'a shot' and a healthy LP then with nothing.
Interestingly I did find an article when I got home that backed both of our opinions up...

'QUOTE 'When we talk about a hormone problem, you have likely miscarried in less than 10 weeks. After that, the placenta has taken over hormone production and any normal deficiency you have is not a factor. Low progesterone, the most common problem, is not as easy to treat as you might hope. Progesterone suppositories, while frequently prescribed, are not proven to be helpful and often actually cause a nonviable pregnancy to last longer than it should.
The only situation where progesterone is a sure solution is with a luteal phase defect, where the corpus luteum, which is formed along with egg at ovulation, does not produce the hormones needed to sustain a pregnancy. For most women, however, this is usually not an every-month problem. Usually the situation rights itself with the next egg and the next corpus luteum. This problem, if it is a permanent one, can be diagnosed through two separate endometrial biopsies. Progesterone must be started 48 hours after ovulation to work. By the time you have missed a period, it is too late to save a pregnancy with a luteal phase defect


I've found alot of docs seem to have conflicting opinions on whether luteal phase means anything to ttc and the treatment of.

If I get a BFP then obviously I prove my doc wrong eh?

Well..sorry if that was much longer than expected! I guess the short answer would have been 'through charting and online research' lol
__________________
Jo xxx






Seperated June 2010 from my husband. One daughter DOB 26/07/2006. BFP 06/01/2011, due september but 'high risk' for premature birth.

Hi. Im Jolene. 31 years old. I suffered three years of a short luteal phase and didnt think I could get pregnant again without medical assistance but fell pregnant by accident and naturally. I am really happy and excited to be having a baby although knowing Im going it alone this time is a bit daunting and scary!

Last edited by Mommy2Dakota; October 6th, 2009 at 08:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
October 6th, 2009, 09:07 AM
Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,242
Great explanation. I'm still sorry your doctor is such a ninny.

To answer your question, no you wouldn't change pre-AF spotting to CD 1. It's just that, pre-AF. You can have it and still get a BFP even. Just leave the first day of any sort of flow as CD 1.
__________________
~Thanks Babydoll213 for my awesome siggie!~



Reply With Quote
  #8  
October 6th, 2009, 10:58 AM
Coley's Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: East Falls, Pennsylvania
Posts: 10,956
I hope you do prove your doctor wrong.

Sadly, there are still so many doctors who don't put any credence in charting, temping, etc. They think that we can't possibly figure out what's wrong on our own. Hmph!

Don't get me wrong, there are times when you need them... but if you know what to look for and how to listen to your body, there are certain issues you can identify yourself... like an LPD!

I wish you the best of luck and hope you get that BFP really soon!
__________________



Reply With Quote
  #9  
October 7th, 2009, 12:38 AM
Mega Super Mommy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,342
Thankyou! Means alot to hear that...and I really really want to prove my doc wrong!
__________________
Jo xxx






Seperated June 2010 from my husband. One daughter DOB 26/07/2006. BFP 06/01/2011, due september but 'high risk' for premature birth.

Hi. Im Jolene. 31 years old. I suffered three years of a short luteal phase and didnt think I could get pregnant again without medical assistance but fell pregnant by accident and naturally. I am really happy and excited to be having a baby although knowing Im going it alone this time is a bit daunting and scary!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Topic Tools Search this Topic
Search this Topic:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:52 PM.


Copyright © 2003-2011 JustMommies.com, All Rights Reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0