We pride ourselves on having the friendliest
and most welcoming forums for moms and moms to be! Please take a moment
for free so you can be a part of our growing community of mothers.
If you have any problems registering please drop an email to email@example.com.
Our community is moderated by our moderation team so you won't see spam or offensive messages posted on our forums. Each of our message boards is hosted by JustMommies hosts, whose names are listed at the top each board. We hope you find our message boards friendly, helpful, and fun to be on!
I have seen people that age raise children.....either grandchildren or foster children or whatever.
Me personally.... I don't know. My thing is, my family has a long history of dying in their 50's. I don't think I would want to take on the responsibility of a child knowing the risk of what my health could do.
It's one thing to raise a child due to circumstances such as a death of the parent or bad home life, but I couldn't imagine going through the fertility treatments and pregnancy at that age and then raising an infant. I barely wonder how I do it in my mid 30's let alone later in life. I see my parents with my girls and they're worn out after a day with them and they're young for their ages and active (they're in their late 50's).
Not in a million years. My parents were 40 when my brothers were born. Which was fine then. But now they are 57, and my brothers are almost 18 and quite a handful. My parents don't regret their decision at all, my brothers are worth it, but they will be the first to admit that it is hard, hard work. So having an infant at 50 and a teenager in your late 60's is way out of the ballpark for me.
My cousin's husband was 54 when they had their first child (she's in her early 40's), so it's definitely feasible.