Log In Sign Up

Food Companies Reviewing "Lying Labels"

Forum: Heated Debates


Welcome to the JustMommies Message Boards.

We pride ourselves on having the friendliest and most welcoming forums for moms and moms to be! Please take a moment and register for free so you can be a part of our growing community of mothers. If you have any problems registering please drop an email to boards@justmommies.com.

Our community is moderated by our moderation team so you won't see spam or offensive messages posted on our forums. Each of our message boards is hosted by JustMommies hosts, whose names are listed at the top each board. We hope you find our message boards friendly, helpful, and fun to be on!

Reply Post New Topic
  Subscribe To Heated Debates LinkBack Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
June 16th, 2010, 09:47 AM
Quantum_Leap's Avatar frequent flier
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle area, Washington
Posts: 9,756
This is on the TV in the background right now. And I just found an article about it. Lying Food Labels - MORE Magazine - For Women 40 Plus Basically, FDA guidelines allow food companies to have a margin of error of up to 20% on their food labels. That means that the food you buy could (and often does) have 20% more calories, 20% more fat, 20% more everything than the package label says it does. In fact, on the news here they've done some tests in their own labs and found food packages (mostly frozen meals) that actually had 350% more fat than the package label said. What do you think? Is the margin of error that the FDA allows too high?

Thank you to the SSMC makers for my beautiful siggies!

(x2)(x2)(October 2011)
Reply With Quote
June 16th, 2010, 10:01 AM
plan4fate's Avatar I may bend, but not break
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 26,789
Send a message via MSN to plan4fate
Well since the basic science is depenent on a specific test on specific products it is going to vary. We did the calorie test in highschool. my peanut had x amt of calories, the table next to me had double the amt. the table behind me had 5 more than I did. Until we can produce food with a specific amt of calories, no more, no less ... we're going to have this.

personally 10% sounds fair.
TTC #1 together since December 2011
ttc naturally until end of year

May 6th- bfp @ 10dpo ended in a Chemical Pregnancy May 15th @5w1d

Me: Hashi's, PCOS,Multiple miscarriages
Him: MFI low count, low morphology, low motility Vitamins started August 2nd.

Reply With Quote

Topic Tools Search this Topic
Search this Topic:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0