Log In Sign Up

use of photos in medical journals


Forum: Heated Debates

Notices

Welcome to the JustMommies Message Boards.

We pride ourselves on having the friendliest and most welcoming forums for moms and moms to be! Please take a moment and register for free so you can be a part of our growing community of mothers. If you have any problems registering please drop an email to boards@justmommies.com.

Our community is moderated by our moderation team so you won't see spam or offensive messages posted on our forums. Each of our message boards is hosted by JustMommies hosts, whose names are listed at the top each board. We hope you find our message boards friendly, helpful, and fun to be on!

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By Hey... Where's Perry?

Reply Post New Topic
  Subscribe To Heated Debates LinkBack Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
  #1  
March 2nd, 2012, 06:34 AM
Quantum_Leap's Avatar frequent flier
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle area, Washington
Posts: 9,747
I was trolling around Wikipedia the other day and randomly followed some links that led me to this article: Medical photography: ethics, consent and the intersex patient - Creighton - 2008 - BJU International - Wiley Online Library

The article focuses on intersex patients (this is the current medical term for what was once referred to as hermaphroditism), and how photographs of the genitalia of intersex patients are frequently used in medical journals, medical textbooks, and other educational materials, purportedly for the purpose of educating doctors about treatment options. The authors take issue with these photographs, on the grounds that (a) they are often obtained and/or used without the consent of the patient, (b) the photographer does not always take the necessary steps to ensure the patient's anonymity (i.e. the patient's face or other identifiable features are included in the photo), and, (c) they are frequently of young children, who are not always able to give their consent and who might be traumatized by the experience of being photographed naked (even for a medical purpose).

I can't copy and paste quotes from the article because it's a PDF and the copy and paste function isn't working for me. But the article is interesting, you should read it.

So....what do you think? Which is more important: the medical community's need to obtain photographs of very rare conditions in order to educate future doctors? Or should the patient's right to privacy trump this? In particular, when it comes to very young children with these types of conditions, should their parents have the right to consent to their photographs being used? Or should we err on the side of patient privacy until the child comes of age and is able to give consent on his own?
__________________

Thank you to the SSMC makers for my beautiful siggies!

(x2)(x2)(October 2011)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
March 2nd, 2012, 06:57 AM
Fluffy Baby's Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SW FL
Posts: 8,785
nak

i am leaning towards pictures need to be taken, but the appropiate premission should be sought after.
bbl
__________________
Leann <3 Hector
My trio: Alyssa 7, Tristan 4.75, Gavin 1.5

I am a mixture of all that and a bag of chips... IJS



Rest In Peace Jennifer <3



Reply With Quote
  #3  
March 2nd, 2012, 02:10 PM
*Leslie*'s Avatar Mega Super Mommy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,979
Send a message via AIM to *Leslie* Send a message via Yahoo to *Leslie*
I'm confused as to why the photo would ever have to show identifying features. As with any pic, permission should always be given before anyone publishes anything. If people could be assured that their faces wouldn't be posted, you'd probably have a lot of people willing to give their consent.
__________________



Reply With Quote
  #4  
March 2nd, 2012, 03:56 PM
HappyHippy's Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pavia, Italy
Posts: 5,959
I always think the consent should be given. Also in some hospitals people do sign photography consent forms in case of an abnormality, and many patients don't even know this. A lot of times it's with other things you're signing and you won't know about it unless you read the forms. I also know Doctors who take pictures of ambiguous (sp) genatalia when a baby is born, but they don't publish it unless consent is given. The picture is put in the patients files for future refrences especially if surgery is going to be performed. Which leads me to another thing, most surgical Doctors take before and after pictures (even if it's not cosmetic surgery).
__________________
Mama to G, L & twins F & M
Started off 2013 homebirthing suprise twins Fia Celesta & Maddalena Isabella
Reply With Quote
  #5  
March 2nd, 2012, 04:56 PM
Hey... Where's Perry?'s Avatar Darnit face
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fluffy Baby View Post
Little baby Gavin is beautiful! Congrats.
Fluffy Baby and HappyHippy like this.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
March 2nd, 2012, 08:19 PM
Fluffy Baby's Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SW FL
Posts: 8,785
Thank you
__________________
Leann <3 Hector
My trio: Alyssa 7, Tristan 4.75, Gavin 1.5

I am a mixture of all that and a bag of chips... IJS



Rest In Peace Jennifer <3



Reply With Quote
Reply

Topic Tools Search this Topic
Search this Topic:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:57 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0