FF says I'm possibly triphasic!

*krista* · #1 January 31st, 2009, 08:02 AM

I've never been possibly triphasic!!

I know it doesn't most definitly point to pregnancy, but it still makes me very happy!

I'm trying not to get too excited, though, because this cycle is just weird. FF says I O'ed on CD 22, but it could have also been CD 26, which would blow the triphasic theory.

Usually I have a fairly definite O date, but not this go round. Temps from CD 22 to 26 are just a little too low to be without a doubt post-O, and too high to be pre-O. I think FF might be right on the O date, though, because I have never had temps that high right before O... so that make me think maybe I did O on CD 22 and my temps were just a little lower than normal? The CD 26 theory doesn't show my normal pre-O dip. I always dip pretty low and stay low for several days pre-O.

So... what do the experts think? And when should I test?

ETA: Oh yeah, and I forgot to mention that I have consistantly O'ed between CD 21 and 24 for the past five months, mostly landing on CD 22.

#2 January 31st, 2009, 11:11 AM

Going by the CM I think you O'd later than FF says

alicenwonderland · #3 January 31st, 2009, 11:11 AM

looks awesome! I would test in 2-3 days! Good luck!

*krista* · #4 January 31st, 2009, 11:14 AM

You two ladies just illustrated exactly what is going on in my head.

alicenwonderland · #5 January 31st, 2009, 11:19 AM

lol, after looking at your cm... i'm starting to agree with fi.... i'm not sure though. you didn't chart cp for a couple days. I usually o the day before my cervix becomes low firm and closed.

#6 January 31st, 2009, 11:22 AM

Typically drying up would confirm ovulation, which is why I'd say you Od later than it says. If you do test now, don't get too disheartened if it shows nothing!

*krista* · #7 January 31st, 2009, 11:28 AM

I'm really regretting no CP on those days between CD 24 and 26. I totally shot myself in the foot there.

I have had watery CM after a very clear O before. Usually I have EWCM just before O, which I didn't have after CD 24... so that puts just enough doubt in my head to think FF may be right. Even if I did O on CD 26, my temps still didn't follow their normal pattern.

I don't know! This cycle sucks, it is just so confusing!

Quote:

Typically drying up would confirm ovulation, which is why I'd say you Od later than it says. If you do test now, don't get too disheartened if it shows nothing![/b]

I'm going to try really REALLY hard not to. I keep telling myself I gotta stay confident, because even if I did O on CD 26 and the temp jump was not a spike after implantation, we still had well timed BDing for O'ing on CD 26.

*krista* · #8 February 2nd, 2009, 05:45 AM

Yep... temp went down... this sucks.

I hope you ladies are right in saying that I O'ed on CD 26... otherwise it looks like I am going into my usual downturn pattern at the end of LP.