Kari ~
I think I've seen your posts on some of the other areas, but just to fill you in on us a bit, since we had an "abnormal" SA as well. I've been off the pill since May 08, no pregnancies, got some prelim. bloodwork done in Sept which showed my progesterone was low, doc started me on Clomid (no luck with 1 round). Before going on to another round I made DH do an SA just a few wks ago. I did A LOT of reading, research, trying to learn as much as possible because I cried & cried when my doc called to say his was "slightly abnormal'. Now that I've had time to process & digest that, I'm a little more chilled out. Here was his numbers just for comparison:
NORMAL:
sperm count per mil: 50
motility 51%
ABNORMAL:
viability 54% (normal >75%)
morphology 26% (normal > 30%)
Now as far as the confusion about morphology I pulled up a few articles online explaining the confusion about it; there are 2 scales that can be used. Kruger introduced the stric Tygerberg criteria & thats divided into 3 categories: normal morphology group (>14% normal forms), good prognosis group (4-14% normal forms) and the poor prognosis group (<4% normal forms). The WHO (world health org) however uses a completely different scale. The cut off value changed from 50% to 30% for them. I will try & find this link of a really good article I found explaining alot about abnormal morphology if you are interested...just let me know. Anyways, I have thought about having DH repeat his SA again in about 6-8wks. I dont know if my OB is giving up on us, when she had called to tell me the results of his SA she said she'd give me 2 more cycles of Clomid to try but then the RE she talked to said "we'd be good candidates for IUI" ...the guy doesnt even know us, so I freaked a bit. Going to wait it out & see what happens a little bit longer. Sorry if this was really long & drawn out but hopefully it helped a tad