Topic: Full Term?
View Single Post
May 16th, 2010, 06:37 AM
PinkFireFly PinkFireFly is offline
Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,430
Originally Posted by jhmomofmany View Post
When did they change the def. of full term? I was *always* told 38 completed weeks is "full term" and that delivering anytime within two weeks of your due date is "on time". Now 36 weeks (some girls in the DDCs are being told 34 weeks!) is full term, and 39 weeks is past due?? Really, what's the deal?

I suspect it has something to do with the rising incidence of premature birth which has (thankfully!) led to better medical care of preemies. Everybody knows somebody who had their baby in the 7th-8th month and "that baby turned out fine". Hey, why be pregnant 9 months when you can get the job done in less time? Could this be another symptom of the "assembly line" style of hospital/OB care? "Get 'er in, get 'er out, here's my bill, who's next"

Makes me wonder...
It was coined a "baby-mill" by a friend of mine...
*9 weeks * 4/11/13
*5 weeks * 6/22/13
Reply With Quote