View Single Post
October 20th, 2013, 07:02 PM
jes81878's Avatar
jes81878 jes81878 is offline
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Burlington, KY
Posts: 613
If they were all great quality, I would transfer two. Besides that fact that caring for three babies would be rough, triplet pregnancies carries a lot of risks. I know that it is rare that all three would take, but I would really research all the possible complications and think seriously if you are willing to take the risk. However, if I had to choose between taking a risk of triplets or no baby....I would transfer 3.

Sorry, my advice is all over the place. You know I'm having twins, and I'm not complaining about the extra doctor's appointment or even that this pregnancy has been really difficult, I just worry that my body won't support two babies, or something will go wrong with this pregnancy.

In the end, it is your body and you know what is best for you, but I could completely understand you deciding either way. It's a hard choice, and I'm praying you have several blasts and don't have to make the decision.
Jennifer 34 (tubal factor and lost my left tube from ectopic)
Andres 34 (perfect SA)
My Son 10
My Son 13
Husband no bio/children (but the best father ever to my two boys)
TTC for 4 years
IVF in June 2013 (BFP)
1st Beta (10dp5dt) #761

Boy/Girl Twins

Reply With Quote