Log In Sign Up

Britney Spears again!!


Forum: Heated Debates

Notices

Welcome to the JustMommies Message Boards.

We pride ourselves on having the friendliest and most welcoming forums for moms and moms to be! Please take a moment and register for free so you can be a part of our growing community of mothers. If you have any problems registering please drop an email to [email protected].

Our community is moderated by our moderation team so you won't see spam or offensive messages posted on our forums. Each of our message boards is hosted by JustMommies hosts, whose names are listed at the top each board. We hope you find our message boards friendly, helpful, and fun to be on!

Reply Post New Topic
  Subscribe To Heated Debates LinkBack Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
  #1  
June 28th, 2006, 12:26 PM
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,429
So I was just on my way back home from Dairy Queen and the radio said that Britney is posing nude while pregnant for a magazine. Not only that, she is going to be holding baby Preston.

What do you think? I was totally appalled at first thinking it was going to be graphic and sexual and she's holding her baby---but then I thought about it, and maybe done artisticly and not showing any 'parts' would be ok. It might even be kind of pretty and natural, nude pictures done tastefully aren't too bad.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
June 28th, 2006, 12:29 PM
Cereal Killer's Avatar Aiming for mediocrity
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in my house
Posts: 7,374
I think it has the potential to be a beautiful portrait. I doubt she would pose pornograhically with her pregnant belly and her son in her arms. I would love to see how it turns out.
__________________
Wife, Mother of 4, Homeschooling, and wine drinking.


Reply With Quote
  #3  
June 28th, 2006, 12:36 PM
CBMS
Guest
Posts: n/a
Demi posed nude [alone] when she was pregnant. It was a beautiful picture.

Britney's no Demi though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
June 28th, 2006, 12:47 PM
Jen25's Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 12,443
It all depends how it comes out. I think it has the potential to be a nice photo.
__________________
~Jen wife to Jay and mommy to a bunch!





Reply With Quote
  #5  
June 28th, 2006, 12:49 PM
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,429
I would do it preggo --- artistically.

I think I was expecting it to be in Maxim or something like that which is a bit weird. If it's in a classier magazine it could be a pretty picture.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
June 28th, 2006, 12:50 PM
kadydid
Guest
Posts: n/a
I hope the baby isn't going to be nude in playboy. I don't think babies belong (especially naked) in any kind of jack off magazine. Pregnancy photos can be Beautiful I just don't think that is the place for them. Even if she was alone, I would hardly dub her playboy worthy. She let her arse get way too fat!

EDIT I misread, I thought she was posing in playboy!! LMAO
Reply With Quote
  #7  
June 28th, 2006, 12:51 PM
Super Mommy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 717
How many portrait studios do you see that take pictures of pregnant women nude? A LOT of women pose nude when pregnant and it's very tasteful and beautiful looking. I doubt she is going to look like a porn star in her picture.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
June 28th, 2006, 12:54 PM
Super Mommy
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 519
I think it could be a beautiful picture if done tastefully, the one thing that kind of makes me sick is that men think of her as a sex symbol and well want to look at anything with the same sentnce as Britney Spears and nude.. and the thought of men wanting to see her pregnant and with her kid sorta makes me sick..
__________________
My Stampin' Up! Site
Reply With Quote
  #9  
June 28th, 2006, 01:34 PM
frgsonmysox's Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Offutt AFB, NE
Posts: 19,799
These are the pictures. I think they are very tasteful

http://www.omgblog.com/2006/06/omg_shes_na...pregnant_on.php
__________________
~Beth~ Wife to my Airman Chris, and mommy to: Anthony Nathaniel (8/31/04), Anastasia Fae (8/01/06), Baby C (lost on 10/12/07), David Cillian (7/31/08), Charles George (4/29/10), and Alan Christopher (2/22/12)





My BLOG - A Day In The Life of a Freg (it's a little bit of everything!)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
June 28th, 2006, 02:08 PM
Ashes78
Guest
Posts: n/a
My eyes, my eyes. They had to have done some major airbrushing and touching up to those photos.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
June 28th, 2006, 02:09 PM
kadydid
Guest
Posts: n/a
How many think she was air brushed?? ME ME ME

The pictures do look nice though, and I am SOOOO glad it I misread and it wasn't for playboy
Reply With Quote
  #12  
June 28th, 2006, 02:12 PM
Super Mommy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 717
I didn't know she died her hair...I was getting tired of the trailer trash bleach blonde look she was sporting...she looks much better. I think the photos are very pretty. Dh nearly had a cow "Omg, she's posing naked and PREGNANT?" I had to explain to him that a LOT of women pose naked when pregnant. They are very proud of their bodies and their "motherly" look. I think it's a wonderful thing.

Most ppl just freak because it's Britney and ....omg...she's a bad mother. *rolls eyes*
Reply With Quote
  #13  
June 28th, 2006, 02:42 PM
Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,966
They probaly did do alot of airbrushing. The pics are beautiful. I think she is a beautiful women when she trys. I saw a picture in this really nice black dress with this pregnancy.


I think alot of men find pregnant women sexy. I know when I had my son my dh said he missed my round preggo belly.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
June 28th, 2006, 03:17 PM
frgsonmysox's Avatar Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Offutt AFB, NE
Posts: 19,799
I don't necessarily think they had to do airbrushing! This is my second pregnancy and I have yet to have stretch marks and all that stuff that supposedly pregnant women get. It's not impossible that she still looks good.
__________________
~Beth~ Wife to my Airman Chris, and mommy to: Anthony Nathaniel (8/31/04), Anastasia Fae (8/01/06), Baby C (lost on 10/12/07), David Cillian (7/31/08), Charles George (4/29/10), and Alan Christopher (2/22/12)





My BLOG - A Day In The Life of a Freg (it's a little bit of everything!)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
June 28th, 2006, 03:20 PM
Cereal Killer's Avatar Aiming for mediocrity
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in my house
Posts: 7,374
Airbrushed or not, I think they are beautiful. I am not a huge Brit fan, but I can't say I can fault her for having airbrushing done, lol. When I had my pregnancy portraits done I insisted on it (I even had them take out my tatoo. )...every little bit helps.
__________________
Wife, Mother of 4, Homeschooling, and wine drinking.


Reply With Quote
  #17  
June 28th, 2006, 03:31 PM
Platinum Supermommy
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,120
You can put that girl in front of a world renouwned photographer, put her in tasteful, classy poses, airbrush the crap of her-she's still trailer trash to me, sorry!

And not for nothing, but I would take tasteful nudes like that in a second, but there's no way in he11 I would let them be printed in a national magazine!
__________________
Those who love me know how to reach me...it's been real ladies, peace and love!!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
June 28th, 2006, 03:45 PM
Mega Super Mommy
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Angelo, Texas
Posts: 3,274
Quote:
I don't necessarily think they had to do airbrushing! This is my second pregnancy and I have yet to have stretch marks and all that stuff that supposedly pregnant women get. It's not impossible that she still looks good.[/b]
I completely agree. I'm not a huge fan on Britney Spears, but she is also due in October (when I'm due) and she looks only a little bigger then I am and I'm on my first child. I haven't gotten any stretch marks or dimples or anything like that so far. I think the photos look very classy. In a way, it's kind a thumbs up for showing the world that pregnant women are hot!
Amanda
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19  
June 28th, 2006, 03:59 PM
EmeraldRain44's Avatar Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 18
Don\'t get me wrong, I really like Brittney. I have always liked her. Even when she made her stupid little mistakes, or even the big ones for that matter. That just showed to me that she was a normal person and not all that fake glitz that most stars try to be when they get famous. To me it just meant that she was still willing to be a normal person and try things and not be afraid to take risks and deal with the consequences. However, this whole thing about her posing naked for the magazine. I have saw the pictures and do think that they were tastfully done, but I believe that it was mostly done on her part for the publicity because the media has kind of been focusing on the bad things in her life when they do focus on her at all. Or now they are more focused on her hubby then her, and I think that maybe she might have some jealously towards that. JMO though.
__________________
<div align="center"></div>
<div align="center"></div>
<div align="center"></div>
<div align="center"></div>
Reply With Quote
  #20  
June 28th, 2006, 04:14 PM
Ashes78
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quote:
You can put that girl in front of a world renouwned photographer, put her in tasteful, classy poses, airbrush the crap of her-she's still trailer trash to me, sorry![/b]
You took the words out of my mouth!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Topic Tools Search this Topic
Search this Topic:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:25 PM.